FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
ufo forum Forum Index
->
other then ufo subjects
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
ON
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable HTML in this post
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
Jakaś kategoria
----------------
UFO Forum
other then ufo subjects
Topic review
Author
Message
shoes9l6i
Posted: Thu 6:21, 21 Apr 2011
Post subject: nike atmosphere jordan 11 Principles Over Position
,
Nike Jordan AJF 8
What is a “Good Agreement?”
A good agreement is more than fair getting to “yes.” A good agreement is one which is sage and effective, and which improves relationships. Wise agreements satisfy both party's interests and are fair and permanent. With maximum long-term clients, affair partners and team members the quality of the ongoing relationship is more major than the result of the particular negotiation. In order to maintain and hopefully improve relationships how you get to “yes” materials.
1) It is an inefficient means of reaching agreements.
4) It encourages stubbornness thus harming the parties' relationship.
THIRD - Finally, the parties argue the problem trying to find a solution on which they can agree.
v class="clear">
FIRST - Begin with an analysis of the situation or problem, of the other party's interests and perceptions, and of the existing adoptions.
Getting to Yes:
In 1983 Roger Fisher and William Ury, wrote a ground-breaking book entitled “Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In.” This writing, now a classic, describes four principles for efficacious negotiation and the problems with “positional bargaining.”
SECOND - Plan ways of answering to the position and the other party's interests.
Principles Over Positions:
Principled negotiation attempts maybe a better path of reaching good agreements. This process can be accustomed effectively on about whichever type of clash. Fisher and Ury amplified four principles of negotiation.
I. Separate the PEOPLE from the Problem:
Because people tend to transform personally contained with the issues and their respective position, they may feel resistance to their position as a private bombard. Separating yourself and your self from the issues allows you to address the problem without damaging relationships. It will also allow you to get a extra clear outlook of the material of the conflict.
The authors of [the book] identify 3 elementary sorts of folk problems: (1) differ perceptions among the parties; (2) sensations such as alarm and inflame; and (3) communication problems. Running from these quite person issues ambition not assist you overcome them. Instead dare yourself and do the following:
・ Try to comprehend the other person's attitude by putting yourself in the other's place.
・ Do not
These 4 principles should be hired collaboratively at each stage of the negotiation process.
2) The agreements tend to neglect the other party's respective interests.
Negotiation is a Fact of Life:
Negotiation is a truth of daily go life. Whether as a enterprise of one or an thousand, negotiations take location all day. Some negotiations take place with mini or not notification such for while you and a co-worker resolve where to eat lunch. Many negotiations, whatever, especially those with higher stakes, such as compensation issues, can be loaded with nervousness. Salaries, commissions, money premiums,
jordan 8 shoes
, the department of work amid crew members must often be refereed in array apt approach nice agreements.
The Problem With Positions:
Negotiations commonly emulate a process of “positional bargaining.” Positional bargaining represents a win-lose,
nike air jordan 11
, versus a win-win paradigm. In positional bargaining every party opens with her rank on an issue then bargains from the party’s separate beginning positions to eventually coincide on one position. Haggling over a amount is a typical example of positional bargaining, with both parties having a bottom line figure in mind. According to Fisher and Ury, positional bargaining does not tend to generate good agreements for the following reasons:
Four Principles of Good Negotiation:
(1) Separate the PEOPLE from the Problem.
(2) Focus on INTERESTS, not Positions.
(3) Invent OPTIONS for joint gain.
(4) Insist on using objective CRITERIA above which to pedestal agreement.
3) Ego tends to be involved.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Boyz theme by
Zarron Media
2003
Regulamin